On 15 Sep 2002 at 2:35, Hermit wrote:
>
> [Joe Dees] This is Mermaid's favorite (and so far as I am able to
> discern, her only) tactic; to refuse to consider a position on its
> merits and instead engage in logically fallacious ad hominem character
> assassination by association upon its author. But a position must
> stand, or fall, on its own merits and independent of its author; this
> is logical Holy Writ.
>
> [Hermit] Poor demented Mr McPees loses it again. He cannot refute the
> fact that his 75% assertion is not supported by a meta-analysis of
> polls by Gallup.
>
Taken BEFORE Bush began making his case at the UN; after that, a
Time/USA Today poll showed an uptick to 75%
>
> He cannot refute the fact that Gallup reflected that
> as many Americans think that the administration has not done enough to
> explain to the American public why the U.S. might take military action
> to remove Saddam Hussein from power as think that they should go to
> war.
>
Hermit cannot refite the fact that that poll to which he referred was not
only taken BEFORE Bush;s UN speech, but also showed that 80%
would approve of US pre-emptive regime change in Iraq if the case
could be made (remember the aluminum tubing, to be used to purify
fissile uranium, possessing no other use, and which Iraq is attempting
to obtain?) that Iraq is pursuing nukes.
>
> He cannot refute the fact that a Gallup poll indicates that far
> more Americans think that we need UN approval before going to war than
> think we should go to war. So he lies, becomes wrought up, whines,
> screams and rants.
>
Hermit is pissed because I showed that he used an August 6th pre-UN
speech poll to falsley indicate what people though concerning the issue
after the UN speech.
>
> [Hermit] Given the total deterioration of his intellect (and
> judgment), we can hope that it will not be much longer before he is
> reduced to sitting drooling as he watches daytime television along
> with his mother, rather than attempting to destroy keyboards,
> inconvenient facts and the list with his fists.
>
The inconvenient fact that Hermit continues to conveniently forget
clearly deminstratesd that what he cannot truthfully prove he will resort
to lying about. Thus, his debate ethics are as flawed as his intellect
and his position,
And, you sorry sack of snail shit, while mu mother is incontinent and
canot walk or feed herself, she does not drool, nor does she - or I -
watch soap operas.
>
> ----
> This message was posted by Hermit to the Virus 2002 board on Church of
> Virus BBS.
> <http://virus.lucifer.com/bbs/index.php?board=51;action=display;thread
> id=26582>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Sep 22 2002 - 05:06:24 MDT