On 9 Sep 2002 at 0:45, Hermit wrote:
>
> No Mr Dees.
>
> If this were a debate, you wopuld not have been able to introduce a
> slew of new unfounded assertions into the discussion after your
> founding statement. Neither could you have continued debating after
> your slew of personal invective.
>
My assertions are supportable by reference to Atlantic Monthly, the
New Yorker, Foreign Affairs Magazine, Policy Review Magazine, and
many extremely credible sources. And your immediate invectives
against the US and Israel, when we were supposedly discussing
conventional pre-emptive Iraqi regime change, set the tone.
>
> So while it served quite adequately to show you up as a non-debater,
> who does not do his homework, this is and was in no way a "debate,"
> except possibly in your dreams. Which is also where it seems you
> dredge up most of your "facts."
>
It showed that I am far better prepared to defend my postion vis-a-vis a
conventional pre-emptive Iraqi regime change than you are to attack it,
which is precisely why you attempted the diversionary strategy I called
you on.
>
Joe: 1 Hermit: 0
> ----
> This message was posted by Hermit to the Virus 2002 board on Church of
> Virus BBS.
> <http://virus.lucifer.com/bbs/index.php?board=51;action=display;thread
> id=26442>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Sep 22 2002 - 05:06:22 MDT