Re:virus: righteousness in nature

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Sun Aug 25 2002 - 10:27:05 MDT


On 25 Aug 2002 at 3:53, rhinoceros wrote:

>
> [Walter Watts]
> To marginate at the right versus wrong oasis whilst the gonadal
> products are slain on ANY account is to pay homage to the
> "intentional" stance. A "god" of design. A "caring" deity that somehow
> has a stake in the "biological phlegm" that cogitates and can discern
> "right from wrong".
>
> I don't acknowledge their "rightness".
>
> Only their survival.
>
> And the "accidental" nature of our existence.
>
> To hope for righteousness in nature is to disavow its statistically
> avaricious history.
>
> Regards,
> Walter
> <only taking cues from what I see in nature>
>
>
> [rhinoceros]
> What is worse is that we, unlike the rest of nature, know we won't
> survive anyway. Not even the avidest survivalists, such as
> non-smokers.
>
And when I'm dead
And when I'm gone
There'll be one child
Born in this world
To carry on
To carry on
> ----
> This message was posted by rhinoceros to the Virus 2002 board on
> Church of Virus BBS.
> <http://virus.lucifer.com/bbs/index.php?board=51;action=display;thread
> id=26266>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Sep 22 2002 - 05:06:20 MDT