Re:virus: On to Baghdad?: Yes - The Risks Are Overrated

From: rhinoceros (rhinoceros@freemail.gr)
Date: Sun Aug 11 2002 - 21:14:11 MDT


[Daniel Pipes, Dec 3 2001 article, posted by Joe Dees]

Saddam innocent of 9/11: Lord Robertson, NATO's secretary general, last month told US Senators there is "not a cintilla," of evidence linking Iraq with the 9/11 attacks. Columnist Robert Novak concurs that there is "no Iraqi connection."

Not so. Mohammed Atta, one of the hijackers, met with an Iraqi intelligence agent in Prague. Two of his co-conspirators met with Iraqi intelligence officers in the United Arab Emirates. Bin Laden aides met with officials in Baghdad. Further, Saddam may be behind the recent military-grade anthrax attacks, suggested by the presence of bentonite, a substance only Iraq uses for this purpose.

[rhinoceros]
To Joe: In previous posts, you said there was no known connection between 9/11 and Iraq. Did you find out that there is one?

----
This message was posted by rhinoceros to the Virus 2002 board on Church of Virus BBS.
<http://virus.lucifer.com/bbs/index.php?board=51;action=display;threadid=26039>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Sep 22 2002 - 05:06:18 MDT