On Friday 26 July 2002 6:44 pm, you wrote:
> Saying that a priest who takes sexual advantage of a child
> entrusted to his care "suffers from pedophilia" implies that there is
> something wrong with his sexual functioning, just as saying that
> he suffers from pernicious anemia implies that there something
> wrong with the functioning of his hematopoietic system. If that
> were the issue, it would be his problem, not ours. Our problem is
Also, it wouldn't be the problem of his employer either. Why is everyone
sueing the church because of the actions of their employees, actions which
are not taken on the churches behalf?
Would you consider sueing the employer of someone who raped you tomorrow?
-- === Mark 'Nurgle' Collins http://www.thisisnurgle.org.uk Stupid IRC quote of the <variable time period>: <phoenix> insider, you'll have to excuse nurgle, he's the epitamy of evil
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Sep 22 2002 - 05:06:16 MDT