> What bothers many critics is how postmodernism defies
> elementary logic.
Good. Logic is not the only way one can/must think. Non-logical
statements, emotional statements have their own validity.
> Consider the statement "Everything is subjective." This idea is
> nonsensical, anti-postmodernist Thomas Nagel has written, "for it
> would itself have to be either subjective or objective. But it can't
> be objective, since in that case it would be false if true. And it
> can't be subjective, because then it would not rule out any objective
> claim, including the claim that it is objectively false."
and
> Postmodernist Paul de Man, for example, believed literary theory
> should uphold "a radical relativism": No interpretation of a text is
> better than another, because language is inherently unstable. He
> conceptualized his approach in a sentence that used "sign" to refer to
> language: "Sign and meaning can never coincide." But de Man's theory
> breaks down when applied to his own words. They are themselves signs,
> used to mean something. To communicate his method, he has to draw on
> the property of language he denies it as having.
This isn't a postmodernists problem. The logical positivists had the
same difficulty with their (very logical) "verification principle". the
problem here is one of language and self-reference, not logical or
lack thereof.
Dismissing such a disperate movement as "postmodernism" in its
entirity doesn't seem very rational to me.
Walpurgissss
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.noumenal.net/exiles
Under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, the government police
and other authorities can, with out a court order, demand that phone
companies, internet service providers and postal operators hand over
detailed information on individuals such as their name and address, phone
calls made and received, source and destination of emails, the identity of
websites visited and mobile phone location data, which is capable of
revealing the user's whereabouts at any given time and is accurate to
within a few hundred metres.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/humanrights/story/0,7369,731074,00.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Sep 22 2002 - 05:06:16 MDT